About PNND
People of PNND
Primary Documents
Key Issues
Directories
News Room
Events
Become A Member
Newsletter  
Arabic
Dansk
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Japanese
Nederlands
Russian
Svensk
PNND Home | Donate | Contact |
|
Mission | Testimonials | History | Issues | Arenas | Why Parliamentarians?
navy

 

Nuclear Testing

 

  By afternoon the wind had fallen silent over Pokhran. At 3:45 p.m. , the timer detonated the three devices. Around 200 to 300 m deep in the earth, the heat generated was equivalent to a million degrees centigrade--as hot as temperatures on the sun. Instantly, rocks weighing around a thousand tonnes, a mini mountain underground, vapourised. Shockwaves from the blasts began to lift a mound of earth the size of a football field by several metres. One scientist on seeing it said, "I can now believe stories of Lord Krishna lifting a hill." -- India Today.

On 28 May 1998 Pakistan detonated five undergound nuclear tests. These followed five nuclear tests by India two weeks earlier. In response to the tests, novelist Arundhati Roy wrote: ?This world of ours is four thousand, six hundred million years old. It could end in an afternoon.?

 

Partial Test Ban Treaty

This world of ours is four thousand,

six hundred million years old.

It could end in an afternoon.

Arundhati Roy

The End of Imagination

In response to growing international awareness of the risks of radiation from nuclear tests, the Soviet Union, US and UK in 1963 negotiated an agreement to prohibit nuclear testing in the atmosphere, outer space and underwater. France and China did not join the treaty and continued atmospheric testing. France stopped atmospheric testing in 1975 following a case in the International Court of Justice and China stopped in 1980.

However, the PTBT did not prevent underground testing, nor the development of new types of nuclear weapons and an increase in stockpiles. In fact the pace of nuclear testing increased after 1963, and nuclear stockpiles doubled between 1963 and 1990.

Threshold Test Ban Treaty

In 1974 the US and Soviet Union concluded the Threshold Test Ban Treaty under which they agreed not to conduct nuclear tests with an explosive yield over 150 kilotons (i.e. about 10 times the force of the Hiroshima bomb). This curtailed their tests of the high yield hydrogen bombs but, like the PTBT, did not slow down the rate of testing itself.

Text Box: ?Snow? in the Marshall Islands    I was eight years old at the time of the Bravo test on Bikini in 1954. I woke up with a bright light in my eyes. There was a huge brilliant light that consumed the sky. Soon after we heard a loud noise and the earth started to sway and sink? A Little later it began to ?snow? in Rongelap. We had heard about snow from the missionaries, but this was the first time we saw white particles fall from the sky. We kids were playing in the powder, but later everyone was sick and we couldn't do anything? My own health has suffered as a result of radiation poisoning. I cannot have children. I have had seven miscarriages. One was severely deformed ? it had only one eye.   Lijon Eknilang  Learning from Rongelap's Pain   Pacific Women Speak Out  The Raven Press, Christchurch, 1998.    Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty

In 1996, the United Nations adopted the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty that had been negotiated in the Conference on Disarmament. The CTBT prohibits all nuclear test explosions, including explosions for peaceful purposes, but does not prohibit testing by other means.

To enter into force, the CTBT requires the ratification of all states with nuclear reactors. Three such states - India , Pakistan and North Korea ? have not signed the CTBT. In addition the US Senate has refused to ratify.

In anticipation that there would be some required states that would be slow in ratifying, the treaty includes a provision calling for conferences of states parties to be held to consider ways to facilitate entry into force. The first of these conferences in 2001 did not take any significant actions in this regard and it does not seem likely that the treaty will enter into force in the near future.

Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO)

The CTBT establishes an agency for its implementation including an international monitoring system (IMS) to assist in verification. The IMS comprises facilities owned by the CTBTO, and those owned and operated by States parties. Although the agency itself cannot officially be established until the CTBT enters into force, the IMS is operating and providing useful data for monitoring and interpretation of seismic events to determine whether or not they are nuclear explosions.

For more information on the CTBTO see http://www.ctbto.org/

A Calendar of Nuclear Weapon Related Tests

since 1994

China :

May 1995. Underground test
July 2001. Subcritical test

France :

5 Sep 1995.Underground test


U.S. Sub-critical Tests:

2 July 1997 , ?Rebound?

18 Sept 1997 , ?Holog?

25 March 1998 , ?Stagecoach?

26 September 1998 , ?Bagpipe?
11 October 1998 , ? Cimarron ,?
9 February 1999 , ?Clarinet?
27 September 1999 , ?Oboe?
10 October 1999 , ?Oboe 2?
6 February 2000 , ?Oboe 3?
22 March 2000 , ?Thoroughbred?

9 April 2000 , ?Oboe 4?
18 August 2000 , Oboe 5
14 December 2000 Oboe 6

India :

11 May 1998 3 underground tests
13 May 1998 2 underground tests
Pakistan :

28 May 1998 5 undergound tests

Russian Sub-critical Tests:

4 November 2000

Nuclear Testing by other means

Although the CTBT has not entered into force, States which have signed are generally obliged to adhere to their commitments under the treaty not to violate the principle provisions. Thus none of the signatories have conducted a nuclear explosion since signing. However, the US, Russia, UK and France have openly conducted other forms of nuclear testing including sub-critical explosions (i.e. where there is no nuclear reaction), fusion experiments, computer simulations and high energy experiments. It is believed that China has also conducted at least one sub-critical test.

One of the reasons for these tests is to upgrade existing weapons designs and test new designs. Following such tests under the ?Stockpile Stewardship Program? the US , for example, has introduced a new weapon into its stockpile ? the B61-mod11.

The US and France are known to be constructing new facilities capable of conducting nuclear experiments including the National Ignition Facility in California, the Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic Testing Facility in Nevada and the Megajoule Facility in France.



For more information see our issues page

 

 

 

 

 

 

References:

Faustian Bargain 2000. Lichterman and Cabasso, WSLF, May 2000

Radioactive Heaven and Earth: The health and environmental effects of nuclear weapons testing in, on and above the earth . IPPNW, Apex Press NY 1991

The End of Imagination , Arundhati Roy ,

http://past.thenation.com/issue/980928/0928AROY.HTM