Parliamentarians for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament
Update 1
September 2001
Items attached and below:
1.
Introduction
2.
United Nations
Statements on Terrorism and Nuclear Disarmament
3.
Pentagon recommends use of nuclear
weapons (Kyodo News)
4.
International disarmament meeting
dates
5.
United Nations Disarmament Education Study
1.
Introduction
Dear PNND member,
Thank you for joining the
Parliamentarians for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament.
We are currently completing the
first stage of development of this network which has been to consult with
parliamentarians and disarmament groups in key countries on the need, scope and
nature of the network. Next month we will begin outreach to invite
parliamentarians to join.
We have secured a website domain
and begun the work of constructing a website, at
archive.pnnd.org Once this is properly operational, information on disarmament
issues and parliamentary actions around the world will be available on the site.
The main language for the website will be English. However, there will be
information pages in French, German, Dutch, Spanish, Japanese, Russian, Arabic
and other languages as we develop.
Feel free to contact me if you
have any questions or suggestions on
alynw@pnnd.org or the European Coordinator Karel Koster on
k.koster@inter.nl.net or the East Asian Coordinator Hiromichi Umebayashi on
CXJ15621@nifty.ne.jp
Yours
Alyn Ware
PNND coordinator
2.
United Nations Statements on
Terrorism and Nuclear Disarmament
a)
Secretary-General Kofi Annan
Nuclear Disarmament
Progress Even More Important after Terrorist Attack on United States Says
Secretary-General to Atomic Energy Agency Meeting
17 September 2001
UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan
in a message to the forty-fifth General Conference of the International Atomic
Energy Agency on 17 September, noted that:
"Making progress in the areas
of nuclear non-proliferation and nuclear disarmament is more important than
ever in the aftermath of last week's appalling terrorist attack on the United
States. The States Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear
Weapons (NPT) agreed last year that this challenge could not be overcome by
halfway measures. Indeed, they concluded that "the total elimination of
nuclear weapons is the only absolute guarantee against the use or threat of
use of nuclear weapons". Regrettably, several important treaties aimed at
nuclear non-proliferation, nuclear disarmament or nuclear reductions still
await entry into force. It is vitally important for the world community to
continue its efforts to implement the commitments already made, and to further
identify the ways and means of achieving nuclear disarmament as soon as
possible."
"Looking towards the future, it
is evident that broad international cooperation is essential to upgrade the
physical protection of nuclear material, to improve capabilities for
intercepting and responding to illicit trafficking in nuclear materials and
other radioactive sources, and to enhance the protection of facilities against
terrorism and sabotage. Another issue of fundamental importance is the
enhancement of nuclear safety worldwide."
The full statement is
available on
http://www.wagingpeace.org/terrorism/010917annan.htm
b) UN Under-Secretary General
Jayantha Dhanapala
Wednesday, 19 September 2001
Terror attacks underscore need for nuclear disarmament, UN official says
19 September -
The terrorist attacks against the
United States on 11 September underscore the need to cut the world's arsenal of
nuclear weapons, according to the top United Nations disarmament official.
"We need to be aware of the fact that this situation could have been much worse
than it has been -- consider for example if weapons of mass destruction were
used by these terrorists," said Under-Secretary-General Jayantha Dhanapala in
response to questions from journalists during a just recorded World Chronicle
television programme. Produced by UN TV, the 30-minute roundtable show will be
distributed to broadcasters next week.
"We need to eliminate weapons of mass destruction because they could fall into
the hands of terrorists," Mr. Dhanapala said. "We don't want to give terrorists
more tools than they have at the moment."
The Under-Secretary-General also stressed the importance of international
anti-terrorism treaties, which "set norms, and give us - civilized society - the
moral right to act in the name of those laws."
Concerning a possible response to the devastating terror attacks, Mr. Dhanapala
noted that the UN Charter did not rule out the use of force. "We're not talking
about an idealistic, utopian world where there are no weapons," he said of the
Charter's vision, noting that Article 51 covers the right of countries to defend
themselves, while Chapter VII deals with the right of defence in the collective
interest of international peace and security. "Both of those obviously require
weapons to be used."
"Clearly, this is a matter which the Security Council ideally should look at,"
he stressed. "If you can identify the person or persons responsible for this
dastardly act of terrorism, then there will be opportunities for action to be
taken."
Contact UN Department of Disarmament
Affairs
United Nations, #3194a
New York, NY 10017, USA
Phone: 212 963 1570 or 212 963 5537
Fax: 212 963 5060
Randy Rydell (Assistant to Ambassador
Dhanapala) at
rydell@un.org
3.
Pentagon recommends use of nuclear weapons
Wednesday, September 19, 2001
WASHINGTON - The Defense Department has recommended to President George W Bush
the use of tactical nuclear weapons as a military option to retaliate for last
week's terrorist attacks in the United States, diplomatic sources said Tuesday.
It is unknown whether Bush has made any decision. But military analysts said the
president is unlikely to opt for the use of nuclear weapons because doing so
would generate rebuke from the international community and could even trigger
revenge from the enemy involving weapons of mass destruction.
But the Pentagon's suggestion shows the determination of U.S. officials to
retaliate for the first massive terrorist attacks on the U.S. mainland, the
analysts said.
The recommendation appears intended to deter terrorists, they said.
On ABC television's THIS WEEK program Sunday, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
refused to rule out the use of tactical nuclear weapons. He avoided clearly
answering a simple question on whether their use can be ruled out. To a similar
question, a Pentagon official also replied, "We will not discuss operational and
intelligence matters."
According to the diplomatic sources, the Pentagon recommended using tactical
nuclear weapons shortly after it became known that an unprecedented number of
civilian casualties resulted from the terrorist attacks.
On Sept 11, hijackers seized four commercial U.S. aircraft. Two of the planes
slammed into the twin towers of New York's World Trade Center, while a third hit
the Pentagon near Washington. The fourth plane crashed outside Pittsburgh. More
than 5,000 people were left dead or missing in the attacks.
Tactical nuclear weapons have been developed to attack very specific targets.
The military analysts said Pentagon officials are apparently thinking of using
weapons that can reach and destroy terrorists hiding in an underground shelter,
limiting damage to non-targets.
In 1986, the U.S. conducted an air raid on Libya, attempting to target Col.
Muammar Qaddafi. In 1998, Washington fired cruise missiles into Afghanistan in
an attempt to kill Osama bin Laden, whom the U.S. sees as behind last week's
terrorist attacks.
The analysts said that since these attempts failed, it may be assumed that U.S.
officials are mulling the use of tactical nuclear weapons, which can cause much
greater destruction.
Declassified official documents show that since the mid-1990s, the U.S. has
indicated that it does not rule out the use of nuclear weapons if a country
attacks the U.S., its allies, or its forces with chemical or biological weapons.
(Kyodo News)
4.
International Disarmament meeting
dates
a) The Conference of States
Parties to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty to discuss Entry into Force of the
Treaty, which was scheduled to take place September 25 - 27, has been postponed.
A new date for the conference has not yet been scheduled.
For updated information
contact:
Department of Disarmament
Affairs
United Nations,
#3194a
New York, NY 10017,
USA
Phone: 212 963 1570
or 212 963 5537
Fax: 212 963 5060
Randy Rydell
(Assistant to Ambassador Dhanapala) at
rydell@un.org
b) The United Nations General
Assembly First Committee (Disarmament and Security) will commence at the UN
Headquarters in NY on October 8 as originally scheduled.
Contact:
UN Dept of Dis't
Affairs (DDA) 1st (Disarmament) Committee
Mr. Kuo-Chung
LIN (Secretary)
http://www.un.org/ga/55/first/first.htm
Ph : 212 963
5595; Fax : 212 963 5305;
e-mail :
lin@un.org
See also
www.un.org/Depts/dda/dda.htm
c)
Biological & Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC): Review Conference
19
Nov-7 Dec Geneva
Contact:
Dr
Jan van Aken, Sunshine Project (Gernany)
Tel. 00 49 40 43188001
van.aken@sunshine-project.org
d)
Certain
Conventional Weapons
Convention Review Conference
Geneva
10-21 Dec
Contact:
Peter Herby
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
Tel. 00 41
22 734 60 01
5.
United Nations Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Education Study
The Department of Disarmament
Affairs is conducting a study on disarmament and non-proliferation education
globally following a consensus resolution requesting this from the United
Nations General Assembly in 2000. UN Member States have been requested to inform
the study group of disarmament and non-proliferation education in their
countries and to make any suggestions on how such education could be enhanced
internationally. Parliamentarians can encourage their Ministries of Education to
respond to this request.
For more information contact:
Michael Cassandra
Secretariat of the
Group of Governmental Experts
Room S-3151 A,
Department for Disarmament Affairs
United Nations, New
York, New York 10017, USA
Tel: (212) 963-4620
or 7714, Fax: (212) 963-1121
Email:
cassandra@un.org
Progress on the study can be
monitored on
www.un.org/Depts/dda/education
|